Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Court considered the winding up of a company, seeking release of lands and claiming rights in the land taken over by the Official Liquidator (OL). The Court estimated the company's share contribution and market value of the lands, determining that the company would be entitled to its respective shares of 50%, 37.5%, and 25% in the Talan, RSEB, and Gulab Bagh lands. A valuation-based approach on these shares was deemed a mode of compensating the company for the value of its share in these lands. The Court declined to direct any adjustment of the claimed amount of Rs. 47 lakhs, as it was not an admitted sum. Regarding the sanction of the revised scheme for compromise and/or arrangement u/s 391/394 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Court directed the OL to verify and file a response/report on the latest position of assets and liabilities, including details of fixed assets, shares, securities, unsecured creditors, and bond holders. The Court directed the Disbursement Committee to recommence disbursements to depositors and bond holders, as per the Supreme Court's order, and continue disbursement of the remaining 1,719 claims. The entire records were to be handed over to a new Committee by 30th April, 2024, which would start functioning from 1st May, 2024, and submit bi-monthly reports.
The Court considered the winding up of a company, seeking release of lands and claiming rights in the land taken over by the Official Liquidator (OL). The Court estimated the company's share contribution and market value of the lands, determining that the company would be entitled to its respective shares of 50%, 37.5%, and 25% in the Talan, RSEB, and Gulab Bagh lands. A valuation-based approach on these shares was deemed a mode of compensating the company for the value of its share in these lands. The Court declined to direct any adjustment of the claimed amount of Rs. 47 lakhs, as it was not an admitted sum. Regarding the sanction of the revised scheme for compromise and/or arrangement u/s 391/394 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Court directed the OL to verify and file a response/report on the latest position of assets and liabilities, including details of fixed assets, shares, securities, unsecured creditors, and bond holders. The Court directed the Disbursement Committee to recommence disbursements to depositors and bond holders, as per the Supreme Court's order, and continue disbursement of the remaining 1,719 claims. The entire records were to be handed over to a new Committee by 30th April, 2024, which would start functioning from 1st May, 2024, and submit bi-monthly reports.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.