Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Respondent No.1 & 2 directed to initiate action under Chapter XIV of Companies Act, 2013 against respondent No.3 and sister group companies for manipulating records and siphoning funds to shell companies. Court finds inaction by respondents No.1 & 2 unfathomable despite information about financial affairs. Imperative to exercise statutory duties in arresting pilferage, safeguard interests of petitioner and others. Respondents No.1 & 2 conjointly directed to inspect affairs of respondent No.3 and related companies as per IRP reports, ensure compliance u/ss 206 to 210, submit Inspection Report within four weeks. Matter re-notified for hearing.
Respondent No.1 & 2 directed to initiate action under Chapter XIV of Companies Act, 2013 against respondent No.3 and sister group companies for manipulating records and siphoning funds to shell companies. Court finds inaction by respondents No.1 & 2 unfathomable despite information about financial affairs. Imperative to exercise statutory duties in arresting pilferage, safeguard interests of petitioner and others. Respondents No.1 & 2 conjointly directed to inspect affairs of respondent No.3 and related companies as per IRP reports, ensure compliance u/ss 206 to 210, submit Inspection Report within four weeks. Matter re-notified for hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
