Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Subsidy received by the appellant under Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme 2010 from the State Government cannot be included in assessable value of goods cleared during 1.4.2016 to 31.03.2017 u/s 4(3)(d) of Central Excise Act. Following latest decision in M/S HARIT POLYTECH PVT. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & CGST- JAIPUR I and other cases, where subsidy does not reduce sales tax required to be paid by assessee, subsidy amount cannot be included in transaction value for central excise duty levy. VAT amount paid by assessee using VAT 37B challans construed as actual VAT payment, not included in transaction value u/s 4(3)(d). Impugned order set aside. Appeal allowed.
Subsidy received by the appellant under Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme 2010 from the State Government cannot be included in assessable value of goods cleared during 1.4.2016 to 31.03.2017 u/s 4(3)(d) of Central Excise Act. Following latest decision in M/S HARIT POLYTECH PVT. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & CGST- JAIPUR I and other cases, where subsidy does not reduce sales tax required to be paid by assessee, subsidy amount cannot be included in transaction value for central excise duty levy. VAT amount paid by assessee using VAT 37B challans construed as actual VAT payment, not included in transaction value u/s 4(3)(d). Impugned order set aside. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.