Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Advance Ruling application maintainable for recipient liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, despite definition of 'advance ruling' - Section 95 to be interpreted contextually - Fiction u/s 9(3) brings recipient within ambit of Chapter XVII for seeking Advance Ruling - Application erroneously rejected at threshold u/s 98(2) - No appeal lies against rejection u/s 98(2) - Matter remitted to AAR to decide application afresh u/s 98(4) - Impugned order set aside - Petition allowed by way of remand.
Advance Ruling application maintainable for recipient liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, despite definition of 'advance ruling' - Section 95 to be interpreted contextually - Fiction u/s 9(3) brings recipient within ambit of Chapter XVII for seeking Advance Ruling - Application erroneously rejected at threshold u/s 98(2) - No appeal lies against rejection u/s 98(2) - Matter remitted to AAR to decide application afresh u/s 98(4) - Impugned order set aside - Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
