Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Advance Ruling application maintainable for recipient liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, despite definition of 'advance ruling' - Section 95 to be interpreted contextually - Fiction u/s 9(3) brings recipient within ambit of Chapter XVII for seeking Advance Ruling - Application erroneously rejected at threshold u/s 98(2) - No appeal lies against rejection u/s 98(2) - Matter remitted to AAR to decide application afresh u/s 98(4) - Impugned order set aside - Petition allowed by way of remand.
Advance Ruling application maintainable for recipient liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, despite definition of 'advance ruling' - Section 95 to be interpreted contextually - Fiction u/s 9(3) brings recipient within ambit of Chapter XVII for seeking Advance Ruling - Application erroneously rejected at threshold u/s 98(2) - No appeal lies against rejection u/s 98(2) - Matter remitted to AAR to decide application afresh u/s 98(4) - Impugned order set aside - Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.