Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Advance Ruling application maintainable for recipient liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, despite definition of 'advance ruling' - Section 95 to be interpreted contextually - Fiction u/s 9(3) brings recipient within ambit of Chapter XVII for seeking Advance Ruling - Application erroneously rejected at threshold u/s 98(2) - No appeal lies against rejection u/s 98(2) - Matter remitted to AAR to decide application afresh u/s 98(4) - Impugned order set aside - Petition allowed by way of remand.
Advance Ruling application maintainable for recipient liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, despite definition of 'advance ruling' - Section 95 to be interpreted contextually - Fiction u/s 9(3) brings recipient within ambit of Chapter XVII for seeking Advance Ruling - Application erroneously rejected at threshold u/s 98(2) - No appeal lies against rejection u/s 98(2) - Matter remitted to AAR to decide application afresh u/s 98(4) - Impugned order set aside - Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
