Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Inadvertent human error in filing a return led to denial of input tax credit (ITC) claim due to incorrect GSTIN number. The digital platform foreclosed the remedy to rectify the error due to passage of time. The court held that the denial was a bona fide mistake, and the IDA who deducted and paid the tax was made a party. Refund denial could lead to the petitioner's company closing down, considering the huge refund amount. The court directed the respondent authorities to facilitate opening the portal for a limited period or allow manual rectification upon the petitioner's representation, as this is a peculiar and special circumstance. The assessing officer can verify the specific deductions claimed with the returns filed by the IDA. The petition was allowed.
Inadvertent human error in filing a return led to denial of input tax credit (ITC) claim due to incorrect GSTIN number. The digital platform foreclosed the remedy to rectify the error due to passage of time. The court held that the denial was a bona fide mistake, and the IDA who deducted and paid the tax was made a party. Refund denial could lead to the petitioner's company closing down, considering the huge refund amount. The court directed the respondent authorities to facilitate opening the portal for a limited period or allow manual rectification upon the petitioner's representation, as this is a peculiar and special circumstance. The assessing officer can verify the specific deductions claimed with the returns filed by the IDA. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.