Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 147/148 proceedings can only be initiated based on the original reasons recorded for forming the opinion of escapement of income. The Assessing Officer cannot deviate, supplement or supplant those reasons subsequently. Explanation 3 to Section 147 does not empower the Assessing Officer to improve upon or change the original reasons. The validity of reassessment must be judged from the standpoint of the initial reasons recorded. Once reassessment is validly initiated, Explanation 3 allows the Assessing Officer to consider other issues during reassessment proceedings, subject to the requirement of valid initiation. The High Court quashed the impugned notices and orders, deciding in favor of the assessee.
Section 147/148 proceedings can only be initiated based on the original reasons recorded for forming the opinion of escapement of income. The Assessing Officer cannot deviate, supplement or supplant those reasons subsequently. Explanation 3 to Section 147 does not empower the Assessing Officer to improve upon or change the original reasons. The validity of reassessment must be judged from the standpoint of the initial reasons recorded. Once reassessment is validly initiated, Explanation 3 allows the Assessing Officer to consider other issues during reassessment proceedings, subject to the requirement of valid initiation. The High Court quashed the impugned notices and orders, deciding in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.