Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind, accepted assessee's submissions after receiving replies. Not a case of no enquiry or lack of enquiry. AO made expected enquiries, accepted source of cash deposits after notices to assessee. Order prejudicial to Revenue but not erroneous considering enquiries. CIT did not examine details himself, merely set aside matter for fresh assessment without further enquiries. Decisions support proposition that where AO conducted enquiries on demonetization cash deposits and took possible view, CIT not justified invoking revision u/s 263 by directing fresh enquiry without conducting further enquiries himself. AO made detailed enquiries, took possible view, hence CIT not justified invoking section 263. Order set aside, assessee's grounds allowed.
Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind, accepted assessee's submissions after receiving replies. Not a case of no enquiry or lack of enquiry. AO made expected enquiries, accepted source of cash deposits after notices to assessee. Order prejudicial to Revenue but not erroneous considering enquiries. CIT did not examine details himself, merely set aside matter for fresh assessment without further enquiries. Decisions support proposition that where AO conducted enquiries on demonetization cash deposits and took possible view, CIT not justified invoking revision u/s 263 by directing fresh enquiry without conducting further enquiries himself. AO made detailed enquiries, took possible view, hence CIT not justified invoking section 263. Order set aside, assessee's grounds allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
