Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty u/ss 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 upheld. Market enquiry conducted in presence of appellant's representative, who accepted re-calculated F.O.B. value. Appellant's representative admitted and agreed to value arrived during market enquiry u/s 108. Exporter participated in market enquiry with independent sellers and agreed to value arrived. Misdeclaration of quantity and value led to confiscation u/s 113(i),(ia),(ja). Overvaluation around 2.8 times justified penalty u/ss 114 and 114AA for intentional misdeclaration to avail undue export benefits. Impugned order affirmed, appeal dismissed.
Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty u/ss 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 upheld. Market enquiry conducted in presence of appellant's representative, who accepted re-calculated F.O.B. value. Appellant's representative admitted and agreed to value arrived during market enquiry u/s 108. Exporter participated in market enquiry with independent sellers and agreed to value arrived. Misdeclaration of quantity and value led to confiscation u/s 113(i),(ia),(ja). Overvaluation around 2.8 times justified penalty u/ss 114 and 114AA for intentional misdeclaration to avail undue export benefits. Impugned order affirmed, appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
