Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Advance Ruling application on maintainability - Reversal of input tax credit to extent of tax element in credit note - no agreement between parties on credit notes not treated as financial/commercial credit notes - no agreement to reduce ITC claim - mismatch of ITC claim figures between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A - impact of incorrect output tax liability reduction based on credit note issued. Questions on ITC reversal based on credit notes and eligibility to claim ITC based on original invoices admissible u/s 97(2)(d) of CGST Act. Questions on ITC rejection due to GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch and impact of supplier's incorrect output tax liability reduction on applicant's ITC not covered u/s 97(2). Applicant issued notice u/s 61 for discrepancies, advance ruling filed later. Proceedings pending against applicant, application liable to be rejected u/s 98(2) first proviso.
Advance Ruling application on maintainability - Reversal of input tax credit to extent of tax element in credit note - no agreement between parties on credit notes not treated as financial/commercial credit notes - no agreement to reduce ITC claim - mismatch of ITC claim figures between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A - impact of incorrect output tax liability reduction based on credit note issued. Questions on ITC reversal based on credit notes and eligibility to claim ITC based on original invoices admissible u/s 97(2)(d) of CGST Act. Questions on ITC rejection due to GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch and impact of supplier's incorrect output tax liability reduction on applicant's ITC not covered u/s 97(2). Applicant issued notice u/s 61 for discrepancies, advance ruling filed later. Proceedings pending against applicant, application liable to be rejected u/s 98(2) first proviso.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
