Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Section 56(2)(x) applies to buyers, while Section 50C applies to sellers. The assessee acquired development rights, not immovable property. Based on the Supreme Court's decision in Seshasayee Steels (P) Ltd, the difference between stamp duty value and actual purchase value is not taxable u/s 56(2)(x) for acquiring development rights. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal.
Section 56(2)(x) applies to buyers, while Section 50C applies to sellers. The assessee acquired development rights, not immovable property. Based on the Supreme Court's decision in Seshasayee Steels (P) Ltd, the difference between stamp duty value and actual purchase value is not taxable u/s 56(2)(x) for acquiring development rights. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.