Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee, a non-resident Indian, did not file return of income for AY 2014-15 as TDS on interest income from investment was deducted at 12.5% instead of 10% under India-UAE DTAA. Assessment order lacked direction or satisfaction for penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c). Case neither involved concealment nor furnishing inaccurate particulars of income as declared income was accepted. Assessee's belief of proper TDS deduction based on legitimate expectation accepted. Penalty proceedings unsustainable under law. Point determined in favor of assessee against revenue.
Assessee, a non-resident Indian, did not file return of income for AY 2014-15 as TDS on interest income from investment was deducted at 12.5% instead of 10% under India-UAE DTAA. Assessment order lacked direction or satisfaction for penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c). Case neither involved concealment nor furnishing inaccurate particulars of income as declared income was accepted. Assessee's belief of proper TDS deduction based on legitimate expectation accepted. Penalty proceedings unsustainable under law. Point determined in favor of assessee against revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.