Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment, reliable financial data, and careful review of working capital and receivables adjustmen...
Transfer pricing rules require benchmarking corporate guarantees and associated-enterprise advances, while invalid domestic-transaction adjustments ca...
Prospective sugar export prohibition required registered letters of credit; private contracts and export quotas created no enforceable continuation ri...
Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
TDS u/s 195 - Taxability of income in India - PE in India - taxation of offshore supplies - Taxation of Fee for Technical Services (FTS) in the absence of FTS article under India-Thailand DTAA. The Tribunal held that HCIL, a subsidiary of Honda Motors Company Ltd., was not required to deduct tax at source for payments made for purchase of raw materials, components, etc. from non-resident associated enterprises as they did not have a PE in India. The Tribunal observed that the DRP and the Department had accepted that these associated enterprises did not have a PE in India. Regarding taxation of offshore supplies, the Tribunal held that since HCIL did not have a PE in India, the directions to attribute profits to operations carried out in the PE were not applicable. Concerning FTS receipts, the Tribunal held that in the absence of an FTS article in the India-Thailand DTAA, and without a PE in India, the FTS receipts were not liable to tax in India as per Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act.
TDS u/s 195 - Taxability of income in India - PE in India - taxation of offshore supplies - Taxation of Fee for Technical Services (FTS) in the absence of FTS article under India-Thailand DTAA. The Tribunal held that HCIL, a subsidiary of Honda Motors Company Ltd., was not required to deduct tax at source for payments made for purchase of raw materials, components, etc. from non-resident associated enterprises as they did not have a PE in India. The Tribunal observed that the DRP and the Department had accepted that these associated enterprises did not have a PE in India. Regarding taxation of offshore supplies, the Tribunal held that since HCIL did not have a PE in India, the directions to attribute profits to operations carried out in the PE were not applicable. Concerning FTS receipts, the Tribunal held that in the absence of an FTS article in the India-Thailand DTAA, and without a PE in India, the FTS receipts were not liable to tax in India as per Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
