Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TDS u/s 195 - Taxability of income in India - PE in India - taxation of offshore supplies - Taxation of Fee for Technical Services (FTS) in the absence of FTS article under India-Thailand DTAA. The Tribunal held that HCIL, a subsidiary of Honda Motors Company Ltd., was not required to deduct tax at source for payments made for purchase of raw materials, components, etc. from non-resident associated enterprises as they did not have a PE in India. The Tribunal observed that the DRP and the Department had accepted that these associated enterprises did not have a PE in India. Regarding taxation of offshore supplies, the Tribunal held that since HCIL did not have a PE in India, the directions to attribute profits to operations carried out in the PE were not applicable. Concerning FTS receipts, the Tribunal held that in the absence of an FTS article in the India-Thailand DTAA, and without a PE in India, the FTS receipts were not liable to tax in India as per Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act.
TDS u/s 195 - Taxability of income in India - PE in India - taxation of offshore supplies - Taxation of Fee for Technical Services (FTS) in the absence of FTS article under India-Thailand DTAA. The Tribunal held that HCIL, a subsidiary of Honda Motors Company Ltd., was not required to deduct tax at source for payments made for purchase of raw materials, components, etc. from non-resident associated enterprises as they did not have a PE in India. The Tribunal observed that the DRP and the Department had accepted that these associated enterprises did not have a PE in India. Regarding taxation of offshore supplies, the Tribunal held that since HCIL did not have a PE in India, the directions to attribute profits to operations carried out in the PE were not applicable. Concerning FTS receipts, the Tribunal held that in the absence of an FTS article in the India-Thailand DTAA, and without a PE in India, the FTS receipts were not liable to tax in India as per Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
