Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Addition based on unsubstantiated documents like loose sheets, jottings, and Excel sheets - unaccounted cash receipts from students - cannot be sustained. Statements recorded solely cannot constitute incriminating material for additions. Unsubstantiated loose papers without corroboration by inquiry or leading to undisclosed assets cannot be basis for additions. Suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. AO failed to establish live link between seized material and unaccounted fees resulting in undisclosed assets. Uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence. Presumption u/s 132(4) is rebuttable. AO should act judicially on adequate material, not arbitrarily. Additions cannot be made without examining concerned students/parents. Mere notes in diaries/loose sheets require corroboration. Non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence showing undisclosed income cannot be relied upon for additions.
Addition based on unsubstantiated documents like loose sheets, jottings, and Excel sheets - unaccounted cash receipts from students - cannot be sustained. Statements recorded solely cannot constitute incriminating material for additions. Unsubstantiated loose papers without corroboration by inquiry or leading to undisclosed assets cannot be basis for additions. Suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. AO failed to establish live link between seized material and unaccounted fees resulting in undisclosed assets. Uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence. Presumption u/s 132(4) is rebuttable. AO should act judicially on adequate material, not arbitrarily. Additions cannot be made without examining concerned students/parents. Mere notes in diaries/loose sheets require corroboration. Non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence showing undisclosed income cannot be relied upon for additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
