Donor-directed corpus contributions retain capital character despite exemption claims under section 10(23C)(vi), preventing their treatment as taxable...
Enhanced tax-audit threshold applies where banking records establish compliant non-cash receipts and payments, eliminating penalty exposure for audit ...
Transfer pricing consistency protects identical non-interest-bearing debenture terms from a later notional-interest adjustment without valid statutory...
Rectification of debatable deduction claims cannot reverse scrutiny-approved co-operative society interest income deductions as apparent record errors...
Cash-method accounting bars presumptive interest taxation, while unsupported securities and share-trading additions require reliable material and veri...
Addition based on unsubstantiated documents like loose sheets, jottings, and Excel sheets - unaccounted cash receipts from students - cannot be sustained. Statements recorded solely cannot constitute incriminating material for additions. Unsubstantiated loose papers without corroboration by inquiry or leading to undisclosed assets cannot be basis for additions. Suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. AO failed to establish live link between seized material and unaccounted fees resulting in undisclosed assets. Uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence. Presumption u/s 132(4) is rebuttable. AO should act judicially on adequate material, not arbitrarily. Additions cannot be made without examining concerned students/parents. Mere notes in diaries/loose sheets require corroboration. Non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence showing undisclosed income cannot be relied upon for additions.
Addition based on unsubstantiated documents like loose sheets, jottings, and Excel sheets - unaccounted cash receipts from students - cannot be sustained. Statements recorded solely cannot constitute incriminating material for additions. Unsubstantiated loose papers without corroboration by inquiry or leading to undisclosed assets cannot be basis for additions. Suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. AO failed to establish live link between seized material and unaccounted fees resulting in undisclosed assets. Uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence. Presumption u/s 132(4) is rebuttable. AO should act judicially on adequate material, not arbitrarily. Additions cannot be made without examining concerned students/parents. Mere notes in diaries/loose sheets require corroboration. Non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence showing undisclosed income cannot be relied upon for additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
