Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Addition based on unsubstantiated documents like loose sheets, jottings, and Excel sheets - unaccounted cash receipts from students - cannot be sustained. Statements recorded solely cannot constitute incriminating material for additions. Unsubstantiated loose papers without corroboration by inquiry or leading to undisclosed assets cannot be basis for additions. Suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. AO failed to establish live link between seized material and unaccounted fees resulting in undisclosed assets. Uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence. Presumption u/s 132(4) is rebuttable. AO should act judicially on adequate material, not arbitrarily. Additions cannot be made without examining concerned students/parents. Mere notes in diaries/loose sheets require corroboration. Non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence showing undisclosed income cannot be relied upon for additions.
Addition based on unsubstantiated documents like loose sheets, jottings, and Excel sheets - unaccounted cash receipts from students - cannot be sustained. Statements recorded solely cannot constitute incriminating material for additions. Unsubstantiated loose papers without corroboration by inquiry or leading to undisclosed assets cannot be basis for additions. Suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. AO failed to establish live link between seized material and unaccounted fees resulting in undisclosed assets. Uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence. Presumption u/s 132(4) is rebuttable. AO should act judicially on adequate material, not arbitrarily. Additions cannot be made without examining concerned students/parents. Mere notes in diaries/loose sheets require corroboration. Non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence showing undisclosed income cannot be relied upon for additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
