Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Suit for permanent injunction regarding outstanding dues and arrears of storage charges. Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaintiff specifically reserved rights in first suit regarding claim against warehousing charges, damages for illegal use and occupation, and applied for leave to file separate suit, which was granted. No relinquishment or omission to claim relief. Separate causes of action, second suit maintainable. Appellant facing recovery of over Rs. 8 crores, unnecessarily delaying suit pending since 2016. Impugned order does not suffer from infirmity. Appeal dismissed.
Suit for permanent injunction regarding outstanding dues and arrears of storage charges. Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaintiff specifically reserved rights in first suit regarding claim against warehousing charges, damages for illegal use and occupation, and applied for leave to file separate suit, which was granted. No relinquishment or omission to claim relief. Separate causes of action, second suit maintainable. Appellant facing recovery of over Rs. 8 crores, unnecessarily delaying suit pending since 2016. Impugned order does not suffer from infirmity. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.