Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Suit for permanent injunction regarding outstanding dues and arrears of storage charges. Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaintiff specifically reserved rights in first suit regarding claim against warehousing charges, damages for illegal use and occupation, and applied for leave to file separate suit, which was granted. No relinquishment or omission to claim relief. Separate causes of action, second suit maintainable. Appellant facing recovery of over Rs. 8 crores, unnecessarily delaying suit pending since 2016. Impugned order does not suffer from infirmity. Appeal dismissed.
Suit for permanent injunction regarding outstanding dues and arrears of storage charges. Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaintiff specifically reserved rights in first suit regarding claim against warehousing charges, damages for illegal use and occupation, and applied for leave to file separate suit, which was granted. No relinquishment or omission to claim relief. Separate causes of action, second suit maintainable. Appellant facing recovery of over Rs. 8 crores, unnecessarily delaying suit pending since 2016. Impugned order does not suffer from infirmity. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.