Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The reassessment proceeding shall be deemed completed only upon communication of the impugned assessment order to the assessee, not merely when the order was passed. The order cannot be considered passed unless pronounced, published, or the affected party has means of knowing it. Keeping the signed order in file without communicating is insufficient. The reassessment proceeding for AY 2003-2004 was completed on 05-04-2007 when the order was served, beyond the limitation period prescribed u/s 153(2). Availability of statutory appeal does not bar entertaining a writ petition under Article 226 in certain exceptions like violation of statutory provisions, natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or pure legal controversy. The impugned assessment orders were quashed for violating section 153(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The reassessment proceeding shall be deemed completed only upon communication of the impugned assessment order to the assessee, not merely when the order was passed. The order cannot be considered passed unless pronounced, published, or the affected party has means of knowing it. Keeping the signed order in file without communicating is insufficient. The reassessment proceeding for AY 2003-2004 was completed on 05-04-2007 when the order was served, beyond the limitation period prescribed u/s 153(2). Availability of statutory appeal does not bar entertaining a writ petition under Article 226 in certain exceptions like violation of statutory provisions, natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or pure legal controversy. The impugned assessment orders were quashed for violating section 153(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
