Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The reassessment proceeding shall be deemed completed only upon communication of the impugned assessment order to the assessee, not merely when the order was passed. The order cannot be considered passed unless pronounced, published, or the affected party has means of knowing it. Keeping the signed order in file without communicating is insufficient. The reassessment proceeding for AY 2003-2004 was completed on 05-04-2007 when the order was served, beyond the limitation period prescribed u/s 153(2). Availability of statutory appeal does not bar entertaining a writ petition under Article 226 in certain exceptions like violation of statutory provisions, natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or pure legal controversy. The impugned assessment orders were quashed for violating section 153(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The reassessment proceeding shall be deemed completed only upon communication of the impugned assessment order to the assessee, not merely when the order was passed. The order cannot be considered passed unless pronounced, published, or the affected party has means of knowing it. Keeping the signed order in file without communicating is insufficient. The reassessment proceeding for AY 2003-2004 was completed on 05-04-2007 when the order was served, beyond the limitation period prescribed u/s 153(2). Availability of statutory appeal does not bar entertaining a writ petition under Article 226 in certain exceptions like violation of statutory provisions, natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or pure legal controversy. The impugned assessment orders were quashed for violating section 153(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
