Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The assessee's short-term capital gains from share trading were rightly treated as business income. Mere mention of shares as investments does not grant benefit under Circular No.4 of 2007. Separate account maintenance, delivery-based transactions, and acceptance of capital gains in preceding years were not sufficient to establish share trading as investments. The assessee was eligible for deduction u/s 80IC as the manufacturing unit was located in a notified area, fulfilling conditions. Disallowance of 20% of milk purchases was unjustified as expenses were duly debited, and net profit ratio was considered for assessment in subsequent years. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim, finding no justification for discrediting purchases on an ad hoc basis.
The assessee's short-term capital gains from share trading were rightly treated as business income. Mere mention of shares as investments does not grant benefit under Circular No.4 of 2007. Separate account maintenance, delivery-based transactions, and acceptance of capital gains in preceding years were not sufficient to establish share trading as investments. The assessee was eligible for deduction u/s 80IC as the manufacturing unit was located in a notified area, fulfilling conditions. Disallowance of 20% of milk purchases was unjustified as expenses were duly debited, and net profit ratio was considered for assessment in subsequent years. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim, finding no justification for discrediting purchases on an ad hoc basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
