Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The appellant's self-assessment u/s 17(1) of the Customs Act was rejected, and re-assessment was done u/s 17(4) through Notification No. 12/2021-Customs (ADD) dated 05.03.2021. The Tribunal held that the imported goods, described as 'Color Toner Black' in the Bill of Entry, were excluded from the anti-dumping duty levied on 'black toner in powder form' by the Notification dated 05.03.2021, as it explicitly excluded color toners. A color toner comprises four colors (CMYK), with 'K' denoting black. The Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) erred in failing to appreciate this distinction and the Notification's exclusion of color toners. Consequently, the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order dated 17.11.2022 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The appellant's self-assessment u/s 17(1) of the Customs Act was rejected, and re-assessment was done u/s 17(4) through Notification No. 12/2021-Customs (ADD) dated 05.03.2021. The Tribunal held that the imported goods, described as 'Color Toner Black' in the Bill of Entry, were excluded from the anti-dumping duty levied on 'black toner in powder form' by the Notification dated 05.03.2021, as it explicitly excluded color toners. A color toner comprises four colors (CMYK), with 'K' denoting black. The Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) erred in failing to appreciate this distinction and the Notification's exclusion of color toners. Consequently, the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order dated 17.11.2022 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.