Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Doctrine of necessity invoked to grant opportunity to deposit balance amount into liquidation account to avoid liquidation and enable Corporate Debtor to revive as going concern. Section 60(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 empowers Tribunal to pass appropriate order to meet Code's objective despite contrary provisions. Appellant granted last chance to deposit amount within one month, failing which relaxation lapses and liquidator can seek alternate buyer as per law. Appeal disposed of.
Doctrine of necessity invoked to grant opportunity to deposit balance amount into liquidation account to avoid liquidation and enable Corporate Debtor to revive as going concern. Section 60(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 empowers Tribunal to pass appropriate order to meet Code's objective despite contrary provisions. Appellant granted last chance to deposit amount within one month, failing which relaxation lapses and liquidator can seek alternate buyer as per law. Appeal disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.