Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Doctrine of necessity invoked to grant opportunity to deposit balance amount into liquidation account to avoid liquidation and enable Corporate Debtor to revive as going concern. Section 60(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 empowers Tribunal to pass appropriate order to meet Code's objective despite contrary provisions. Appellant granted last chance to deposit amount within one month, failing which relaxation lapses and liquidator can seek alternate buyer as per law. Appeal disposed of.
Doctrine of necessity invoked to grant opportunity to deposit balance amount into liquidation account to avoid liquidation and enable Corporate Debtor to revive as going concern. Section 60(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 empowers Tribunal to pass appropriate order to meet Code's objective despite contrary provisions. Appellant granted last chance to deposit amount within one month, failing which relaxation lapses and liquidator can seek alternate buyer as per law. Appeal disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.