Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Circular No.9 dated 24.05.2019 challenged - authority to delegate power of adjudication by circular contrary to Section 167 requiring notification - assessing authority being inspecting authority leading to conflict of interest. Court held circular traceable to Section 2(91), not Section 167, hence notification unnecessary for authorizing adjudication power. Reliance on Gujarat HC judgment rejecting similar challenge. Adjudication of factual disputes beyond Article 226 writ jurisdiction when alternative remedy available. Writ petition against Circular No.9 and assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21 rejected. Petition disposed of.
Circular No.9 dated 24.05.2019 challenged - authority to delegate power of adjudication by circular contrary to Section 167 requiring notification - assessing authority being inspecting authority leading to conflict of interest. Court held circular traceable to Section 2(91), not Section 167, hence notification unnecessary for authorizing adjudication power. Reliance on Gujarat HC judgment rejecting similar challenge. Adjudication of factual disputes beyond Article 226 writ jurisdiction when alternative remedy available. Writ petition against Circular No.9 and assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21 rejected. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.