Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Royalty income payments made by the assessee for obtaining computer software were not liable to be taxed in India as royalty u/s 9(1)(6). The amounts paid by resident Indian end-users/distributors to non-resident computer software manufacturers/suppliers, as consideration for the resale/use of computer software through EULAs/distribution agreements, are not payments of royalty for the use of copyright in computer software. Therefore, such payments do not give rise to any income taxable in India, and the persons referred to in Section 195 of the Income-tax Act were not liable to deduct TDS u/s 195. The HC order in Commissioner of Income Tax-(LTU) vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. would govern the present proceedings, as there is a DTAA entered with the countries in question, with whose residents the transactions were entered into by the assessee.
Royalty income payments made by the assessee for obtaining computer software were not liable to be taxed in India as royalty u/s 9(1)(6). The amounts paid by resident Indian end-users/distributors to non-resident computer software manufacturers/suppliers, as consideration for the resale/use of computer software through EULAs/distribution agreements, are not payments of royalty for the use of copyright in computer software. Therefore, such payments do not give rise to any income taxable in India, and the persons referred to in Section 195 of the Income-tax Act were not liable to deduct TDS u/s 195. The HC order in Commissioner of Income Tax-(LTU) vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. would govern the present proceedings, as there is a DTAA entered with the countries in question, with whose residents the transactions were entered into by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.