Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
AO failed to conduct proper inquiry regarding alleged bogus long term capital gain by not examining bankers, brokers, Demat agencies involved in transactions, ascertaining source of funds, verifying synchronized trades, summoning person who deposited cheques in assessee's account. Connivance of bankers, brokers, Demat agencies suspected in such scams. AO directed to make larger inquiry, summon relevant parties, determine real income and rightful assessee. Matter remanded to AO for fresh adjudication after due inquiry, providing fair opportunity to assessee. Appeal allowed.
AO failed to conduct proper inquiry regarding alleged bogus long term capital gain by not examining bankers, brokers, Demat agencies involved in transactions, ascertaining source of funds, verifying synchronized trades, summoning person who deposited cheques in assessee's account. Connivance of bankers, brokers, Demat agencies suspected in such scams. AO directed to make larger inquiry, summon relevant parties, determine real income and rightful assessee. Matter remanded to AO for fresh adjudication after due inquiry, providing fair opportunity to assessee. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.