Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction...
Impugned proceedings u/s 147 were held invalid as the notice u/s 148 was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 149. The Tribunal interpreted the amended provisions along with the explanatory memorandum to mean that if the notice was barred by limitation under the erstwhile provisions, it cannot be issued even after the amendment. Consequently, the impugned notice and proceedings were quashed for being initiated beyond the prescribed time limit u/s 149, and the decision was in favor of the assessee.
Impugned proceedings u/s 147 were held invalid as the notice u/s 148 was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 149. The Tribunal interpreted the amended provisions along with the explanatory memorandum to mean that if the notice was barred by limitation under the erstwhile provisions, it cannot be issued even after the amendment. Consequently, the impugned notice and proceedings were quashed for being initiated beyond the prescribed time limit u/s 149, and the decision was in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
