Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Impugned proceedings u/s 147 were held invalid as the notice u/s 148 was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 149. The Tribunal interpreted the amended provisions along with the explanatory memorandum to mean that if the notice was barred by limitation under the erstwhile provisions, it cannot be issued even after the amendment. Consequently, the impugned notice and proceedings were quashed for being initiated beyond the prescribed time limit u/s 149, and the decision was in favor of the assessee.
Impugned proceedings u/s 147 were held invalid as the notice u/s 148 was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 149. The Tribunal interpreted the amended provisions along with the explanatory memorandum to mean that if the notice was barred by limitation under the erstwhile provisions, it cannot be issued even after the amendment. Consequently, the impugned notice and proceedings were quashed for being initiated beyond the prescribed time limit u/s 149, and the decision was in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
