Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liability to pay customs duty when confiscated goods are redeemed after payment of fine u/s 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 includes liability to pay interest on delayed payment u/s 28AB. The customs duty obligation arises only after exercising the option to redeem confiscated goods u/s 125. Once exercised, acceptance is subject to conditions specified, primarily payment of fine in lieu of confiscation. This duty obligation is inextricably connected to the redemption option and is a precondition. The duty obligation does not occasion u/ss 12 or 28 but arises due to the option exercised u/s 125. Section 28 applies for assessing and determining the duty payable u/s 125(2). Once Section 28 applies, interest on delayed payment arises u/s 28AB, obligating payment of interest in addition to duty. The Jagdish Cancer case is not an authority against applying Section 28 for duty calculation when liability arises u/s 125.
Liability to pay customs duty when confiscated goods are redeemed after payment of fine u/s 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 includes liability to pay interest on delayed payment u/s 28AB. The customs duty obligation arises only after exercising the option to redeem confiscated goods u/s 125. Once exercised, acceptance is subject to conditions specified, primarily payment of fine in lieu of confiscation. This duty obligation is inextricably connected to the redemption option and is a precondition. The duty obligation does not occasion u/ss 12 or 28 but arises due to the option exercised u/s 125. Section 28 applies for assessing and determining the duty payable u/s 125(2). Once Section 28 applies, interest on delayed payment arises u/s 28AB, obligating payment of interest in addition to duty. The Jagdish Cancer case is not an authority against applying Section 28 for duty calculation when liability arises u/s 125.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.