Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Petitioner challenged notices issued in Form GST MOV-01 and MOV-07 for not generating e-invoices during transfer of PETN explosives. Court held that petitioner undertook to pay penalty and did not assert goods were exempted. Exemption is a mixed question of fact and law to be examined by respondent. Since notices were issued and petitioner replied, adjudication process should be concluded. Petition disposed of directing respondent to conclude adjudication within four weeks and petitioner permitted to submit reply to revised notice within one week.
Petitioner challenged notices issued in Form GST MOV-01 and MOV-07 for not generating e-invoices during transfer of PETN explosives. Court held that petitioner undertook to pay penalty and did not assert goods were exempted. Exemption is a mixed question of fact and law to be examined by respondent. Since notices were issued and petitioner replied, adjudication process should be concluded. Petition disposed of directing respondent to conclude adjudication within four weeks and petitioner permitted to submit reply to revised notice within one week.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
