Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Petitioner challenged notices issued in Form GST MOV-01 and MOV-07 for not generating e-invoices during transfer of PETN explosives. Court held that petitioner undertook to pay penalty and did not assert goods were exempted. Exemption is a mixed question of fact and law to be examined by respondent. Since notices were issued and petitioner replied, adjudication process should be concluded. Petition disposed of directing respondent to conclude adjudication within four weeks and petitioner permitted to submit reply to revised notice within one week.
Petitioner challenged notices issued in Form GST MOV-01 and MOV-07 for not generating e-invoices during transfer of PETN explosives. Court held that petitioner undertook to pay penalty and did not assert goods were exempted. Exemption is a mixed question of fact and law to be examined by respondent. Since notices were issued and petitioner replied, adjudication process should be concluded. Petition disposed of directing respondent to conclude adjudication within four weeks and petitioner permitted to submit reply to revised notice within one week.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
