Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
In light of the legal provisions and precedent, the Court held that even if excess stock is found during a survey, proceedings u/s 130 of the UPGST Act cannot be initiated. The proper course of action is to determine tax liability u/s 35(6) by following the procedure established u/s 74. Consequently, the impugned orders passed by the authorities initiating proceedings u/s 130 were quashed, and the petition was allowed, in line with the Court's earlier judgment in M/S METENERE LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER.
In light of the legal provisions and precedent, the Court held that even if excess stock is found during a survey, proceedings u/s 130 of the UPGST Act cannot be initiated. The proper course of action is to determine tax liability u/s 35(6) by following the procedure established u/s 74. Consequently, the impugned orders passed by the authorities initiating proceedings u/s 130 were quashed, and the petition was allowed, in line with the Court's earlier judgment in M/S METENERE LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
