Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to petitioner's failure to reply - Petitioner asserted unawareness of proceedings - Interest of justice warrants opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Impugned assessment order set aside on condition of remitting 10% of disputed tax demand within 15 days and permitting petitioner to submit reply to show cause notice - Matter remanded for reconsideration in one case.
Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to petitioner's failure to reply - Petitioner asserted unawareness of proceedings - Interest of justice warrants opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Impugned assessment order set aside on condition of remitting 10% of disputed tax demand within 15 days and permitting petitioner to submit reply to show cause notice - Matter remanded for reconsideration in one case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
