Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to petitioner's failure to reply - Petitioner asserted unawareness of proceedings - Interest of justice warrants opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Impugned assessment order set aside on condition of remitting 10% of disputed tax demand within 15 days and permitting petitioner to submit reply to show cause notice - Matter remanded for reconsideration in one case.
Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to petitioner's failure to reply - Petitioner asserted unawareness of proceedings - Interest of justice warrants opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Impugned assessment order set aside on condition of remitting 10% of disputed tax demand within 15 days and permitting petitioner to submit reply to show cause notice - Matter remanded for reconsideration in one case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.