Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to petitioner's failure to reply - Petitioner asserted unawareness of proceedings - Interest of justice warrants opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Impugned assessment order set aside on condition of remitting 10% of disputed tax demand within 15 days and permitting petitioner to submit reply to show cause notice - Matter remanded for reconsideration in one case.
Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to petitioner's failure to reply - Petitioner asserted unawareness of proceedings - Interest of justice warrants opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Impugned assessment order set aside on condition of remitting 10% of disputed tax demand within 15 days and permitting petitioner to submit reply to show cause notice - Matter remanded for reconsideration in one case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.