Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The Abhivahan Shulk collected by the Chhattisgarh Forest Department from the appellant in lieu of granting permission for coal movement is not eligible for Nil rate of GST under SI. No. 4 & 5 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as it is neither related to "Urban forestry, protection of environment and ecological aspect" nor "Social forestry or farm forestry." The appellant, a power generating company, pays Abhivahan Shulk throughout the year on a recurring basis to the Forest Department for transit pass issuance. This constitutes "supply of continuous service" u/s 2(33) of CGST Act, 2017. Hence, the appellant is ineligible for exemption under SI. No. 9 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as the Abhivahan Permission Shulk paid exceeds Rs. 5000 in a financial year.
The Abhivahan Shulk collected by the Chhattisgarh Forest Department from the appellant in lieu of granting permission for coal movement is not eligible for Nil rate of GST under SI. No. 4 & 5 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as it is neither related to "Urban forestry, protection of environment and ecological aspect" nor "Social forestry or farm forestry." The appellant, a power generating company, pays Abhivahan Shulk throughout the year on a recurring basis to the Forest Department for transit pass issuance. This constitutes "supply of continuous service" u/s 2(33) of CGST Act, 2017. Hence, the appellant is ineligible for exemption under SI. No. 9 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as the Abhivahan Permission Shulk paid exceeds Rs. 5000 in a financial year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
