Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee company paid Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) on dividends distributed to its holding company, a tax resident of Mauritius, at higher rates under the Income Tax Act instead of lower rate of 5% prescribed under the India-Mauritius DTAA. Assessee claimed refund of excess DDT, alleging wrongful denial of treaty benefit. Following the Special Bench decision in Total Oil case, it was held that dividend declared by a domestic company to a non-resident should be taxed at the rate given u/s 115-O, and not the beneficial rates under DTAA, unless the contracting state extends treaty protection to the domestic company. No such protection was shown in the instant case. Hence, treaty benefit was not available in relation to Section 115-O, and assessee's appeals were dismissed.
Assessee company paid Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) on dividends distributed to its holding company, a tax resident of Mauritius, at higher rates under the Income Tax Act instead of lower rate of 5% prescribed under the India-Mauritius DTAA. Assessee claimed refund of excess DDT, alleging wrongful denial of treaty benefit. Following the Special Bench decision in Total Oil case, it was held that dividend declared by a domestic company to a non-resident should be taxed at the rate given u/s 115-O, and not the beneficial rates under DTAA, unless the contracting state extends treaty protection to the domestic company. No such protection was shown in the instant case. Hence, treaty benefit was not available in relation to Section 115-O, and assessee's appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.