Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty for non-fulfilment of export obligation under Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) authorizations was challenged. The specific case involved the petitioner/Company not being served with any show cause notice and no opportunity of personal hearing being given before passing the impugned order, resulting in violation of principles of natural justice. It was held that the appeal remedy is not a complete substitute for entertaining a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution when there is a violation of principles of natural justice. Since the petitioner was not served with any show cause notice and was not given an opportunity of personal hearing before passing the impugned order, the Writ Petition was maintainable. On this sole ground, the impugned order could not be sustained and was liable to be quashed. Consequently, the impugned order dated 24.08.2021 was quashed, and the Petition was allowed.
Levy of penalty for non-fulfilment of export obligation under Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) authorizations was challenged. The specific case involved the petitioner/Company not being served with any show cause notice and no opportunity of personal hearing being given before passing the impugned order, resulting in violation of principles of natural justice. It was held that the appeal remedy is not a complete substitute for entertaining a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution when there is a violation of principles of natural justice. Since the petitioner was not served with any show cause notice and was not given an opportunity of personal hearing before passing the impugned order, the Writ Petition was maintainable. On this sole ground, the impugned order could not be sustained and was liable to be quashed. Consequently, the impugned order dated 24.08.2021 was quashed, and the Petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.