Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Charitable entity u/s 2(15) denied exemption u/ss 11 and 12 by Assessing Officer (AO) on grounds of conducting exhibitions being commercial in nature. ITAT held no markup on consideration charged from exporters, thus activity beyond purview of trade, commerce, business or services related thereto. Assessee not hit by proviso to section 2(15) for conducting exhibitions within India or overseas. AO directed to grant exemption u/ss 11 and 12. Regarding disallowance u/s 11(2) for not specifying objects for accumulation in Form 10, CIT(A) relying on Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court orders held lack of declaration not fatal. Board resolution accumulating surplus for specified purposes u/s 11(2) perused. Claim for prior period expenditure allowed by CIT(A) as expenditure incurred towards trust objects, upheld by ITAT.
Charitable entity u/s 2(15) denied exemption u/ss 11 and 12 by Assessing Officer (AO) on grounds of conducting exhibitions being commercial in nature. ITAT held no markup on consideration charged from exporters, thus activity beyond purview of trade, commerce, business or services related thereto. Assessee not hit by proviso to section 2(15) for conducting exhibitions within India or overseas. AO directed to grant exemption u/ss 11 and 12. Regarding disallowance u/s 11(2) for not specifying objects for accumulation in Form 10, CIT(A) relying on Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court orders held lack of declaration not fatal. Board resolution accumulating surplus for specified purposes u/s 11(2) perused. Claim for prior period expenditure allowed by CIT(A) as expenditure incurred towards trust objects, upheld by ITAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.