Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Dismissal of application seeking payment to 103 employees towards salary arrears. Settlement with 103 employees examined. No double payment made to employees. Held: Appellant's prayers not liable to be allowed. Respondent's reply affidavit categorically explained payments made with CoC approval. No personal liability on RP for payments made after CIRP with CoC approval. Appellant's apprehension of double payment to 103 employees clarified - they won't receive salary payment under Resolution Plan but entitled to gratuity and provident fund. No ground to interfere with Adjudicating Authority's order. Appeal dismissed.
Dismissal of application seeking payment to 103 employees towards salary arrears. Settlement with 103 employees examined. No double payment made to employees. Held: Appellant's prayers not liable to be allowed. Respondent's reply affidavit categorically explained payments made with CoC approval. No personal liability on RP for payments made after CIRP with CoC approval. Appellant's apprehension of double payment to 103 employees clarified - they won't receive salary payment under Resolution Plan but entitled to gratuity and provident fund. No ground to interfere with Adjudicating Authority's order. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.