Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Dismissal of application seeking payment to 103 employees towards salary arrears. Settlement with 103 employees examined. No double payment made to employees. Held: Appellant's prayers not liable to be allowed. Respondent's reply affidavit categorically explained payments made with CoC approval. No personal liability on RP for payments made after CIRP with CoC approval. Appellant's apprehension of double payment to 103 employees clarified - they won't receive salary payment under Resolution Plan but entitled to gratuity and provident fund. No ground to interfere with Adjudicating Authority's order. Appeal dismissed.
Dismissal of application seeking payment to 103 employees towards salary arrears. Settlement with 103 employees examined. No double payment made to employees. Held: Appellant's prayers not liable to be allowed. Respondent's reply affidavit categorically explained payments made with CoC approval. No personal liability on RP for payments made after CIRP with CoC approval. Appellant's apprehension of double payment to 103 employees clarified - they won't receive salary payment under Resolution Plan but entitled to gratuity and provident fund. No ground to interfere with Adjudicating Authority's order. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.