Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Tax residency certificate and Global Business License-I held by assessee investment fund incorporated in Mauritius as subsidiary of another Mauritian company. Investments made in Indian companies for over five years before transfer earning long-term capital gains. No evidence of fund flow from India. Conduit status alleged based on immediate transfer of funds after divestment, but commercial rationale established as business model to attract foreign investment. Suspicion alone insufficient to rebut statutory presumption of genuineness based on tax residency certificate. Treaty benefits rightly allowed.
Tax residency certificate and Global Business License-I held by assessee investment fund incorporated in Mauritius as subsidiary of another Mauritian company. Investments made in Indian companies for over five years before transfer earning long-term capital gains. No evidence of fund flow from India. Conduit status alleged based on immediate transfer of funds after divestment, but commercial rationale established as business model to attract foreign investment. Suspicion alone insufficient to rebut statutory presumption of genuineness based on tax residency certificate. Treaty benefits rightly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.