Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Pursuant to the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Chennai v. M/s. Denso Kirloskar Industries Pvt Ltd. and Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s. Hindalco Industries Ltd., charges can be included in the assessable value only if established as a condition of sale and not related to post-importation activities. In the present case, neither the contract nor the impugned order identified procurement of licenses for process know-how or supervision of erection and commissioning as conditions of sale. Moreover, the license fee related to the manufacturing process, a post-importation activity. Since these activities were clearly post-importation and not conditions of sale, the charges paid cannot form part of the assessable value of the goods. Consequently, the impugned order cannot be sustained, and the appeal is allowed.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Chennai v. M/s. Denso Kirloskar Industries Pvt Ltd. and Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s. Hindalco Industries Ltd., charges can be included in the assessable value only if established as a condition of sale and not related to post-importation activities. In the present case, neither the contract nor the impugned order identified procurement of licenses for process know-how or supervision of erection and commissioning as conditions of sale. Moreover, the license fee related to the manufacturing process, a post-importation activity. Since these activities were clearly post-importation and not conditions of sale, the charges paid cannot form part of the assessable value of the goods. Consequently, the impugned order cannot be sustained, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.