Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Provisional orders of attachment issued u/s 83 can be challenged by filing objection u/r 159(5). Petitioner did not file objection. Respondents issued fresh provisional attachment orders as notices u/s 74 could not be served on petitioner, who prima facie avoided service. Provisional attachment orders, though drastic, are permissible to protect revenue interest. Petitioner did not apply for release of property by filing objection u/r 159(5) even after fresh attachment orders. Inquiry u/s 74 is ongoing. At this stage, there appears material for provisional attachment orders. Petitioner did not approach respondents u/r 159(5) and did not explain non-approach. Petitioner not entitled to writ remedy. Petition dismissed.
Provisional orders of attachment issued u/s 83 can be challenged by filing objection u/r 159(5). Petitioner did not file objection. Respondents issued fresh provisional attachment orders as notices u/s 74 could not be served on petitioner, who prima facie avoided service. Provisional attachment orders, though drastic, are permissible to protect revenue interest. Petitioner did not apply for release of property by filing objection u/r 159(5) even after fresh attachment orders. Inquiry u/s 74 is ongoing. At this stage, there appears material for provisional attachment orders. Petitioner did not approach respondents u/r 159(5) and did not explain non-approach. Petitioner not entitled to writ remedy. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.