Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Provisional orders of attachment issued u/s 83 can be challenged by filing objection u/r 159(5). Petitioner did not file objection. Respondents issued fresh provisional attachment orders as notices u/s 74 could not be served on petitioner, who prima facie avoided service. Provisional attachment orders, though drastic, are permissible to protect revenue interest. Petitioner did not apply for release of property by filing objection u/r 159(5) even after fresh attachment orders. Inquiry u/s 74 is ongoing. At this stage, there appears material for provisional attachment orders. Petitioner did not approach respondents u/r 159(5) and did not explain non-approach. Petitioner not entitled to writ remedy. Petition dismissed.
Provisional orders of attachment issued u/s 83 can be challenged by filing objection u/r 159(5). Petitioner did not file objection. Respondents issued fresh provisional attachment orders as notices u/s 74 could not be served on petitioner, who prima facie avoided service. Provisional attachment orders, though drastic, are permissible to protect revenue interest. Petitioner did not apply for release of property by filing objection u/r 159(5) even after fresh attachment orders. Inquiry u/s 74 is ongoing. At this stage, there appears material for provisional attachment orders. Petitioner did not approach respondents u/r 159(5) and did not explain non-approach. Petitioner not entitled to writ remedy. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
