Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Misdeclaration regarding description and quantity of imported goods admitted. Declared goods liable for confiscation due to misdeclaration. Proper investigation not conducted to determine actual transaction value. No admissible evidence for contemporaneous imports. Declared value accepted for declared goods. Appellant failed to furnish evidence for value of excess 140 cartons. Assessable value of excess cartons upheld at Rs.3,56,510/-. Redemption fine reduced to Rs.35,000/- and penalty to Rs.20,000/-. Appeal partly allowed.
Misdeclaration regarding description and quantity of imported goods admitted. Declared goods liable for confiscation due to misdeclaration. Proper investigation not conducted to determine actual transaction value. No admissible evidence for contemporaneous imports. Declared value accepted for declared goods. Appellant failed to furnish evidence for value of excess 140 cartons. Assessable value of excess cartons upheld at Rs.3,56,510/-. Redemption fine reduced to Rs.35,000/- and penalty to Rs.20,000/-. Appeal partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.