Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The court held that Rule 86A empowers the Commissioner or authorized officer to restrict debit of fraudulently availed or ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) from the electronic credit ledger for discharge of liabilities or refund claims, subject to recording reasons in writing. Sub-rule (3) mandates that such restriction shall cease after one year from imposition. As the restriction was imposed on 23rd November 2022 and one year lapsed around 23rd November 2023, the restriction has ceased by operation of law. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The court held that Rule 86A empowers the Commissioner or authorized officer to restrict debit of fraudulently availed or ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) from the electronic credit ledger for discharge of liabilities or refund claims, subject to recording reasons in writing. Sub-rule (3) mandates that such restriction shall cease after one year from imposition. As the restriction was imposed on 23rd November 2022 and one year lapsed around 23rd November 2023, the restriction has ceased by operation of law. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.